Following Marks & Spencers' recent boast that 2% of their workforce would soon be made up of unemployed people on an unpaid workfare scheme, Radical Islington picketed and distributed leaflets outside the company's Holloway Road branch on Sunday, 8th December.
Thanks to the support of groups such
as Boycott Workfare, North London Solidarity Federation and Feminist Fightback the action was a great success! Over 20 people stood outside
the shop chanting and displaying banners and placards about M&S' use
of free labour. More than 500 leaflets were handed out, and
demonstrators engaged in conversation with the public, explaining the
situation at M&S and denouncing workfare in general.
The response was overwhelmingly positive and people were shocked to learn about the company's malpractices. Shoppers were encouraged to boycott M&S as long as they continue their scandalous exploitation of thousands of unemployed people across the country. Unemployed people who will find themselves working full-time for nothing more than their dole.
Prior to this, contact was made with the staff in the store to explain that the protest was not aimed at them but at their bosses. M&S's national policy of using unpaid labour affects all of us, in and out of work, by driving down wages and replacing full time workers with unpaid temporary staff with no employment rights.
Meanwhile M&S will be saving some £1.3 million a month in wages, further stoking their profit whilst lining the deep pockets of their directors and shareholders. Last year M&S made over £500 million profit.
This action was co-ordinated with Haringey Solidarity Group who likewise targeted M&S in Wood Green, as part of a week of action called by Boycott Workfare.
Tuesday, 10 December 2013
Saturday, 23 November 2013
Islington Boycott Workfare - Sun 8 Dec
Marks And Spencer, Pay Your Workers!
As part of Boycott Workfare's week of action (2-8 Dec), Radical Islington are calling
for people to protest outside the Marks and Spencer store on Holloway
Road, in opposition to their use of workfare.
Join us at 1pm on
Sunday 8 December to voice your opposition to unpaid labour and greedy
bosses!
M&S have recently
boasted about providing 'placements' to 1,400 young people. This is a
huge extension of their workfare scheme, which has already seen over
a thousand people work without pay for the company, including single
parents. This represents 2% of their workforce not being paid!
Meanwhile, the company's profits amounted to more than £500M last
year.
So come and protest
against this unashamed use of workfare!
When: Sun 8th
Dec, 1pm
Where: Marks and Spencer, 422 Holloway Road, N7
Where: Marks and Spencer, 422 Holloway Road, N7
See here for more information on Marks and Spencer's use of workfare.
- - - -
Workfare is a
government scheme in which unemployed people are bullied into working
for their Jobseekers' Allowance benefits. People on the Workfare
scheme are forced to stack shelves for up to 30 hours a week, working
out to an hourly wage of just £1.60.
Workfare profits the
rich by providing free labour, whilst threatening the poor by taking
away welfare rights if people refuse to work without a living wage.
It affects all of us by reducing jobs and giving employers the green
light to cut hours and reduce wages.
In response to a
growing movement of opposition to the Workfare scheme, a number of
companies have quit the programme, while the government has released
a steady stream of untruths. So join the movement!
See here for further information on workfare.
Saturday, 6 July 2013
Social Housing for Mount Pleasant!
NO TO GENTRIFICATION!
SOCIAL HOUSING FOR MOUNT PLEASANT!
The planning application for the Mount Pleasant redevelopment is now on line, on the Islington Council website:
http://tinyurl.com/oo4vut2
There are many documents related to the application but possibly the most important one for us is the housing statement:
http://planning.islington.gov. uk/NorthgatePublicDocs/ 00252132.pdf
It sets the provision of social rented housing at an outrageous 11% (77 out of 681 units), with another 8% of "intermediate" housing (55 units). This makes a total of 19% so-called affordable housing.
As a reminder, Islington Council say they are committed to a total of 50% affordable housing on large developments, and a total of 35% social rented housing.
This means 80 per cent exclusive flats and the gentrification of yet another part of the borough. This development should deliver genuinely affordable social-rented housing. With the austerity measures and the cap on housing benefits, a growing number of people can no longer afford a decent home in the borough. We cannot allow them to be let down in the name of profit.
We have no faith in consultation processes and we are not advocating for people to take part in the council one. But in the absence of a coherent collective movement against this development as of yet, if people want to complain or object to the development they can do so via the following channels:
*Official consultation on the Islington council website (deadline 19th July):
http://planning.islington.gov. uk/Northgate/PlanningExplorer/ PLComments.aspx?pk=343009
* Contact the case officer directly:
sarah.ricketts@islington.gov. uk
020 7527 2364
* Contact Indigo, the PR company hired by Royal Mail to do their dirty work for them:
mount-pleasant@yourshout.org
0800 458 6976
No public meeting seems to have been publicised but if people hear of anything coming up, do get in touch.
SOCIAL HOUSING FOR MOUNT PLEASANT!
The planning application for the Mount Pleasant redevelopment is now on line, on the Islington Council website:
http://tinyurl.com/oo4vut2
There are many documents related to the application but possibly the most important one for us is the housing statement:
http://planning.islington.gov.
It sets the provision of social rented housing at an outrageous 11% (77 out of 681 units), with another 8% of "intermediate" housing (55 units). This makes a total of 19% so-called affordable housing.
As a reminder, Islington Council say they are committed to a total of 50% affordable housing on large developments, and a total of 35% social rented housing.
This means 80 per cent exclusive flats and the gentrification of yet another part of the borough. This development should deliver genuinely affordable social-rented housing. With the austerity measures and the cap on housing benefits, a growing number of people can no longer afford a decent home in the borough. We cannot allow them to be let down in the name of profit.
We have no faith in consultation processes and we are not advocating for people to take part in the council one. But in the absence of a coherent collective movement against this development as of yet, if people want to complain or object to the development they can do so via the following channels:
*Official consultation on the Islington council website (deadline 19th July):
http://planning.islington.gov.
* Contact the case officer directly:
sarah.ricketts@islington.gov.
020 7527 2364
* Contact Indigo, the PR company hired by Royal Mail to do their dirty work for them:
mount-pleasant@yourshout.org
0800 458 6976
No public meeting seems to have been publicised but if people hear of anything coming up, do get in touch.
Sunday, 28 April 2013
ISLINGTON BOYCOTT WORKFARE – SAT 4th MAY
Protest against Poundland!
https://www.facebook.com/events/442341879188989/
This Saturday 4th May, Radical Islington members will be picketing Poundland on Seven Sisters Road, in opposition to their use of workfare. The action is organised jointly with North London Solidarity Federation.
Come and
join the fight against unpaid labour, greedy bosses and capitalist
exploitation!
When: Sat 4th May, 12pm.
Where: Poundland, 39-41 Seven Sisters Road
When: Sat 4th May, 12pm.
Where: Poundland, 39-41 Seven Sisters Road
Workfare is a
government scheme in which unemployed people are bullied into working
for their Jobseekers' Allowance benefits. People on the Workfare
scheme are forced to stack shelves for up to 30 hours a week, working
out to an hourly wage of just £1.60.
Workfare profits the
rich by providing free labour, whilst threatening the poor by taking
away welfare rights if people refuse to work without a living wage. It affects all of us by
reducing jobs and giving employers the green light to cut hours and
reduce wages.
In response to a
growing movement of opposition to the Workfare scheme, a number of
companies have quit the programme, while the government has released
a steady stream of untruths. So join the movement!
Saturday, 20 April 2013
Day of Action Against Letting Agents - Sat 27th April
Been Let Down By a Letting Agency?
Join the Letting Agent Monopoly - Islington Green, 12 noon, Sat 27th April
Our friends at Islington Private Tenants are organising a tour of some local letting agents with a MONOPOLY themed action.
They’ll have props and banner to give out on the day but please bring anything else you have including:
- Banners/ ‘adapted’ letting agent placards
- Monopoly props like top hats and monopoly money
- Anything to make noise with!
RSVP on Facebook if you can: http://www.facebook.com/events/241209972683850/
This action is being organised by local people from north and east London including the private tenant groups Islington Private Tenants, Digs (Hackney), and Tower Hamlets Renters. If you have any questions or ideas, please email hello@hackneyrenters.org
When: Saturday 27 April, 12 noon
Meet: Islington Green, N1 8DU
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The problem with Letting Agents
High rents – research conducted by Shelter found that one in five landlords increase their rents because their letting agent encouraged them to. By contrast, only 4% of landlords increased their rent because they were facing increased costs.
Extortionate, bogus fees – letting agents provide a service to landlords, and charge them for doing so. Yet recently letting agents have started charging bogus fees to tenants as well, often in the region of £300-400 per person just for “admin”, “reference checks” or even “renewing a tenancy”. In Scotland, it is illegal for letting agents to charge tenants any fees.
Discrimination – many lettings agents refuse to let to any tenants in receipt of housing benefit. A recent ‘mystery shopping’ exercise by Crisis found that less than 2% of shared rental properties are available to young single people on benefits. We’ve also come across stories of renters being discriminated against by letting agents because of their gender or race, while Trailblazers, a network of young campaigners with disabilities, have highlighted the poor service their members have received from letting agents.
Unregulated – an amendment to a parliamentary bill on 16 April 2013 means that letting agents will now have to sign up to an ombudsman scheme, and the Office of Fair Trading will have the power to ban those who act improperly. However, it’s still possible for anyone to set up a lettings agency, without any qualifications, need to conform to any code of conduct or provide safeguards.
Profiting from insecurity – letting agents make money from people moving, rather than remaining secure in their homes and putting down roots in a community. According to the English Housing Survey, over a third (35%) of private renters have been in their home for less than a year, compared to 3% of home owners and 8% of social renters.
For further information, see: letdownblog.wordpress.com/
Wednesday, 10 April 2013
Social Housing on Mount Pleasant? Royal Mail will not deliver
ROYAL Mail has organised a new exhibition about the Mount Pleasant
development so people can see the progress being made on the project.
Sadly, no significant changes have been made to the initial proposal. This is despite earlier feedback given at the first exhibition and the strong feelings expressed against most aspects of the development at the Holiday Inn public meeting in November.
This should come as no surprise though. All Royal Mail is doing here is ticking the “consultation process” box. This hollow procedure may give some a sense of democracy but will only damage the community by delivering what promises to be one of the worst developments Islington has seen in years.
If anything, the development looks worse as details of the design emerge. It is an extremely dense development, which will impact heavily on nearby residents and offer crammed housing for the new ones.
Despite what the architects say, the height and design of the buildings (up to 15 storeys) are not in keeping with the wider area, which consists mostly of Victorian and Georgian houses and low rises.
Most shockingly, it is estimated that the proportion of so-called “affordable housing” will only be around 20 per cent. With rents that can be charged up to 80 per cent of market price, everyone knows that “affordable housing” is everything but.
The 20 per cent on offer is a disgrace. What this means is 80 per cent exclusive flats and the gentrification of yet another part of the borough. Expect fancy shops and restaurants, and the usual corporate chains of coffee shops that exploit their staff and avoid paying taxes.
Islington Council says it is committed to 50 per cent affordable housing in large developments. This should be a minimum and the Mount Pleasant development should not be exempt.
What this development should deliver is genuinely affordable social-rented housing. With the austerity measures and the cap on housing benefits, a growing number of people can no longer afford a decent home in the borough. We cannot allow them to be let down in the name of profit.
It is clear by now we cannot trust Royal Mail or anyone to deliver what is needed for the community with this development. It is also clear that nothing will be achieved through the official channels of “consultation”. A solid and collective opposition needs to be built if we want to stand any chance of getting anything out of this development other than an anti-social eyesore.
Sadly, no significant changes have been made to the initial proposal. This is despite earlier feedback given at the first exhibition and the strong feelings expressed against most aspects of the development at the Holiday Inn public meeting in November.
This should come as no surprise though. All Royal Mail is doing here is ticking the “consultation process” box. This hollow procedure may give some a sense of democracy but will only damage the community by delivering what promises to be one of the worst developments Islington has seen in years.
If anything, the development looks worse as details of the design emerge. It is an extremely dense development, which will impact heavily on nearby residents and offer crammed housing for the new ones.
Despite what the architects say, the height and design of the buildings (up to 15 storeys) are not in keeping with the wider area, which consists mostly of Victorian and Georgian houses and low rises.
Most shockingly, it is estimated that the proportion of so-called “affordable housing” will only be around 20 per cent. With rents that can be charged up to 80 per cent of market price, everyone knows that “affordable housing” is everything but.
The 20 per cent on offer is a disgrace. What this means is 80 per cent exclusive flats and the gentrification of yet another part of the borough. Expect fancy shops and restaurants, and the usual corporate chains of coffee shops that exploit their staff and avoid paying taxes.
Islington Council says it is committed to 50 per cent affordable housing in large developments. This should be a minimum and the Mount Pleasant development should not be exempt.
What this development should deliver is genuinely affordable social-rented housing. With the austerity measures and the cap on housing benefits, a growing number of people can no longer afford a decent home in the borough. We cannot allow them to be let down in the name of profit.
It is clear by now we cannot trust Royal Mail or anyone to deliver what is needed for the community with this development. It is also clear that nothing will be achieved through the official channels of “consultation”. A solid and collective opposition needs to be built if we want to stand any chance of getting anything out of this development other than an anti-social eyesore.
Thursday, 24 January 2013
A Film showing
- Friday Feb 1st 2013
The Year of the Beaver
A documentary about the 1970s Grunwick strike and the
beginnings of neo-liberalism
The Grunwick strike at a London photo-processing factory
with a predominantly female Asian workforce is the central event around which
many other political issues are considered;
the use of machinery in the intensification of work;
the use of machinery in the intensification of work;
race, migration and gender in the workplace and
workers movement;
lacklustre support for and even sabotage of struggles by union
leaderships;
blacklisting of militant workers;
media misrepresentations of
struggles;
new policing tactics to break picket lines;
and the political
changes leading to Thatcherism.
Friday 1st February 2013 at Reel Islington
The Year of the Beaver (PG)
UK 1985 Dir. Dave Fox/Steve Sprung/Sylvia Stevens. 77 min.
Curated and introduced by Radical Islington
The director Steve Sprung will be attending the screening and talking about the making of the film.
First Friday Film Club takes place on the first Friday evening of every month, in partnership with Holloway Neighbourhood Group and Rowan Arts. Join the First Friday Film Club mailing list to find out which films are showing and to receive early information on events.
EMAIL: info@reelislington.com
LOCATION: The Old Fire Station, 84 Mayton Street, London, N7 6QT
DATE: First Friday of every month. Doors open at 7pm, film starts at 7.30.
COST: £5 / £2.50 unwaged or low wage concession. Refreshments available.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)